[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Reproducible GNU!
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Reproducible GNU! |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Dec 2015 02:07:34 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> This would make verification much more difficult: We’d need ELF-capable
> tools that know about the special section, etc.
That's an easy job, not a real difficulty.
> I would argue that, if builds are reproducible, then the build time of a
> particular build doesn’t matter. What could be useful information is
> the commit or time of commit of the source being built.
Maybe you're right about that -- if the sources match some version in
the repository. But what about when they don't? For instance, if
you've made local changes?
I have found it useful in Emacs to see the date when I built Emacs.
--
Dr Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation (gnu.org, fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (internethalloffame.org)
Skype: No way! See stallman.org/skype.html.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [gnu-prog-discuss] Reproducible GNU!,
Richard Stallman <=