[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Direct symlink farm for transitive dependencies vs search paths
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Direct symlink farm for transitive dependencies vs search paths |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Sep 2024 23:49:47 -0400 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> Let's say that A depends on B, and B depends on C.
> With search paths, A doesn't have symlinks to B, and B doesn't have
> symlinks to C. Thus, disk space is saved.
Sorry, I have no idea what issue you are talking about.
You never otld me.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)