[PATCH 05/10] website: faq: Puri.sm: remove hardware recommendation.

[Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli]

This has several reasons:

- The GNU Boot project didn't review all the hardware made by Pusi.sm,
  especially because Puri.sm also sell hardware that is out of scope
  for the GNU Boot project like USB tokens or SIM cards.

- Reducing the scope to just x86 computers made by Puri.sm instead
  doesn't work either because there is no context to the
  recommendation.

  In harm reduction[1], the Freedom Ladder campaign by the FSF[2], and
  the FSF giving guide[3], context is taken into account so that people
  can make informed choices based on their constraints and choices.

  In practice these approaches make statement like "this computer
  respects more your freedom than this other one", or "this is
  dangerous because of that and you can reduce harm this way, even if
  it's far from perfect" and give context to statements to enable
  people to really understand what it means.

  [1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harm_reduction
  [2]https://www.fsf.org/campaigns/campaigns-summaries#ladder
  [3]https://www.fsf.org/givingguide/

At the end of the day it's also less work and maintenance to just
remove that hardware recommendation statement than to review specific
computers that GNU Boot doesn't even support.

Signed-off-by: Denis 'GNUtoo' Carikli <GNUtoo@cyberdimension.org>
---
 website/pages/faq.md | 2 --
 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/website/pages/faq.md b/website/pages/faq.md
index edeec40..7f6b959 100644
--- a/website/pages/faq.md
+++ b/website/pages/faq.md
@@ -276,8 +276,6 @@ Intel remote access to a computer where it is present.
 
 Intel themselves even admitted it, publicly.
 
-The GNU Boot project recommends avoiding all hardware sold by Purism.
-
 Why is the latest Intel hardware unsupported in GNU Boot? {#intel}
 -----------------------------------------------------------
 
-- 
2.45.2