[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnucap-devel] [Help-gnucap] Bizarre behaviour -- possibly a bug.
From: |
al davis |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnucap-devel] [Help-gnucap] Bizarre behaviour -- possibly a bug. |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Jun 2013 00:02:38 -0400 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-4-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
back from the conference ..
On Tuesday 28 May 2013, Felix Salfelder wrote:
> and tran commands a bit? in gnucap-uf, i have implemented an
> "uic"
> switch for dc
> and a "cont" switch for tran. so this works:
> if you like, you can port this to upstream. lets see if it
> can be done without breaking
> other things (i'm pretty sure). the changes to s_{dc,tran}
> can start as plugins in opt. changes to d_cap and backend
> need more thought...
You should make plugins. That way it can be made available
immediately without waiting for a formal release or formal
testing.
"uic" is not intended to be anything realistic. Especially, it
is not intended to gracefully start anything. The purpose of it
is strictly to start a transient analysis when the circuit does
not have a stable operating point, by jamming in all of the
values and using them regardless of whether they make sense or
not. It is a last resort. These circuits may have several
metastable states.
I agree that there is a need for something more believable. In
particular, the ability to specify something that holds it in
one of the metastable states would be useful.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: [Gnucap-devel] [Help-gnucap] Bizarre behaviour -- possibly a bug.,
al davis <=