|
| From: | Gunnar Farneback |
| Subject: | Re: [gnugo-devel] Strategic penalty and invasions |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Oct 2002 21:56:05 +0200 |
| User-agent: | EMH/1.14.1 SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.3 Emacs/20.7 (sparc-sun-solaris2.7) (with unibyte mode) |
I wrote: > Today it would be more useful to reserve e classification for moves > which are safely connected to an already alive dragon. Then we could > use E and/or I for the other patterns which today have an e or E > classification. It remains to discuss whether we need both E and I > patterns and exactly what those would mean. I propose the following scheme: e: extending moves which are safely connected to a living dragon. E: loose moves which extend from a living dragon without a safe connection I: invasion moves without direct support from own living stones An E classification would overrule I and e would overrule both E and I. Does this scheme make sense and look useful? /Gunnar
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |