[gnugo-devel] two new owl tests.

[Paul Pogonyshev]

this problem was taken from
http://gobase.org/articles/matthews/dans/17/
made two tests of it, both were failed.

while failing the first test is understandable, the blunder after
black B5 looks very bad to me.

Paul


new file, regression/games/owl41.sgf:
(;
FF[4]
GM[1]
SZ[9]
AB[ad][bd][bf][ce][cg][df][dg][dh]
AW[ae][af][bc][bh][cb][cd][ch][dd][di][ef][eg][eh][ff]
;B[be]
)


Index: gnugo/regression/owl1.tst
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/gnugo/gnugo/regression/owl1.tst,v
retrieving revision 1.19
diff -u -r1.19 owl1.tst
--- gnugo/regression/owl1.tst   29 Sep 2002 14:51:06 -0000      1.19
+++ gnugo/regression/owl1.tst   11 Oct 2002 19:19:36 -0000
@@ -98,6 +98,16 @@
 284 owl_defend J9
 #? [1 (M7|H7)]
 
+# Looks like a tough problem for GNU Go.
+loadsgf games/owl41.sgf 1
+285 owl_defend A6
+#? [1 B3]
+
+# Getting into a ko with A3 is no way good.
+loadsgf games/owl41.sgf
+286 owl_attack A6
+#? [1 B3]
+
 ########### end of tests #####################
 
 # Report number of nodes visited by the tactical reading