Re: [gnugo-devel] Patch: Strategic effect for strategic attacks and defenses

[Inge Wallin]

Arend wrote:

> Inge wrote:
> 
> > I ran the regressions on the changed gnugo and got 13 PASSES and 21
> > FAILs.  However, then I discovered a bug and after I fixed that, some
> > half of the FAILs had disappeared and a number of new PASSes had
> > appeared.  I didn't have time to rerun it all, but that is the result
> > I got when I reran a few tests manually (among them strategy and
> > nngs1).
> Sorry, can't resist some advertisement:-)
> That's one of the situations where breakage2tst.py is useful. Pipe
> the orignal "make test" output into it, and you get a .tst file on
> stdout which contains exactly those test with FAILs and PASSes. Then you
> can re-run the fixed version on this .tst file.

This is undoubtly a very useful tool, but in this case it would have
missed the new PASSes that weren't there before.

       -Inge