[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] EJ45
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] EJ45 |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2003 17:15:20 -0800 |
Evan wrote:
> This patch solves nngs4:450 (in my previous email). EJ45 is matching at
> B5, where it shouldn't. This patch expands EJ45 slightly to fix this.
> The constraint may still need some work.
The constraint is:
+; !safe_omove(a) && !oplay_attack(*,B) && !oplay_attack_either(*,c,*,B)
The first oplay_attack seems rather unlikely. How likely is it that
X can capture B after O plays *?
I don't see the motivation for the second oplay either.
Dan