gnugo-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [gnugo-devel] Extremely bad mistake


From: SP LEE
Subject: Re: [gnugo-devel] Extremely bad mistake
Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:01:03 -0700

Maybe I was wrong, but I found gnugo couldn't find A11 as a defense point for 
C19 to make seki. This in turn made C19 as defenseless and gnugo just ignore 
the attack point A16.

Then I come to the question, does gnugo only look at liberties of its own group 
for attack/defense? Of course my question seems to be too fundamental, but I 
really like to see this problem solved.

SP Lee

   A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
19 O . O X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
18 . O O O X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
17 X O O X O . . . . X . . . . . X . . . 17
16 . X O X X X X . . X . . . . . X . . . 16
15 X X O X . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
14 X X X O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
13 X . X X X O X X . X . . . . . . . . . 13
12 X . X X O O . O X . . . . . . . . . . 12
11 . X X O O O . O X . . . . . . . . . . 11     WHITE (O) has captured 5 stones
10 O O X X O O X X . X . . X . . X X . . 10     BLACK (X) has captured 5 stones
 9 . . O X O O O . X . . . X . . . . . . 9
 8 O O O O X X . . . . . . . . X . . . . 8
 7 . X . O . . O . . X . . . . X . . . . 7
 6 . X . . O . . X . . X O . . . . O . . 6
 5 . . . . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
 4 . . X X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . 4
 3 . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . 3
 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2



SP Lee


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


> _______________________________________________
> gnugo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]