[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] Extremely bad mistake
From: |
SP LEE |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] Extremely bad mistake |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Jun 2003 17:01:03 -0700 |
Maybe I was wrong, but I found gnugo couldn't find A11 as a defense point for
C19 to make seki. This in turn made C19 as defenseless and gnugo just ignore
the attack point A16.
Then I come to the question, does gnugo only look at liberties of its own group
for attack/defense? Of course my question seems to be too fundamental, but I
really like to see this problem solved.
SP Lee
A B C D E F G H J K L M N O P Q R S T
19 O . O X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
18 . O O O X X . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
17 X O O X O . . . . X . . . . . X . . . 17
16 . X O X X X X . . X . . . . . X . . . 16
15 X X O X . O X . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
14 X X X O O O X . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
13 X . X X X O X X . X . . . . . . . . . 13
12 X . X X O O . O X . . . . . . . . . . 12
11 . X X O O O . O X . . . . . . . . . . 11 WHITE (O) has captured 5 stones
10 O O X X O O X X . X . . X . . X X . . 10 BLACK (X) has captured 5 stones
9 . . O X O O O . X . . . X . . . . . . 9
8 O O O O X X . . . . . . . . X . . . . 8
7 . X . O . . O . . X . . . . X . . . . 7
6 . X . . O . . X . . X O . . . . O . . 6
5 . . . . . X X . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4 . . X X . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . 4
3 . . . . . . . . . X . . . . . X . . . 3
2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
SP Lee
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> gnugo-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnugo-devel
>
Re: [gnugo-devel] Extremely bad mistake, SP LEE, 2003/06/16
- Re: [gnugo-devel] Extremely bad mistake,
SP LEE <=