Re: [gnugo-devel] Valgrind results and experimental-owl-ext

[bump]

Paul wrote:

> > Gunnar proposed taking out a lot of the experimental
> > options. Clearly we should do so, but also Paul
> > spoke in favor of keeping the owl-ext. Even if we
> > want to keep the code in the unstable line we might
> > consider disabling it in 3.6. On the other hand
> > if Paul is right it might be worth debugging these
> > crashes. Presumably that will not be too hard.
> 
> I suggest to remove the `configure' options for 3.6.  In
> other words, we don't touch the code, but make turning it
> on "non-official" and hackish.  Options that are well
> tested should remain in the `configure'.  For the
> development branch, I think we should do nothing.  This
> will make life easier for anyone who will want to improve
> on experimental stuff.

Right, this is what I meant by "disabling". Even
if we debug the owl-ext crashes we should
probably take out experimental-owl-ext and some
other configure options.

However, we still have a problem since Tristan
got a crash without any of the options enabled.

Dan