[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Debian vs gNewSense -- FS criteria
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Debian vs gNewSense -- FS criteria |
Date: |
Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:14:22 -0400 |
My current _personal_ proposed software distribution classification is:
"gNewSense" as Free ???
"Debian" as Almost-Free ???
Debian is a general term which refer to
Debian GNU/Linux and all others ports
http://www.us.debian.org/ports/
"Debian GNU/Hurd" as Free
"Debian GNU/Linux" as Almost-Free ???
"Debian GNU/NetBSD" not classified yet
"Debian GNU/kFreeBSD" not classified yet
"OpenBSD" as Almost-Free
"FreeBSD" as Almost-Free
"NetBSD" as Almost-Free
"Microsoft Windows Vista" as Non-Free
To the extent of my knowledge, these seem correct.
Should we just tag all more-or-less free software distribution
as 'Freedomware' and let it be exposed to the public in resumes and offers?
That would not serve the purpose; we need to distinguish, for some
purposes, between free distributions and non-free distributions.