[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ranking schemes vs actual work
From: |
Davi Leal |
Subject: |
Re: ranking schemes vs actual work |
Date: |
Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:01:32 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.7 |
Dave Crossland wrote:
> Davi Leal wrote:
> > > However, one has to guard against coordinated sabotage of two types:
> > > pseudo-collaborators who make insincere statements of support (sock
> > > puppets?); and organised groups of detractors (trolls?). I'm not sure
> > > of the best way to do that.
> >
> > It seems complex. If someelse develops it I will take care so that it
> > does not suck. We should try the project do not end in a mess.
>
> How does LinkedIn do it? :-)
I do not know. I am not an user of http://www.linkedin.com/
IMHO, silly ranking schemes [1] is not the way to go. Maybe we should
emphasize even more the actual work the guy has done.
[1]
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/login.jsp?url=/iel5/4278983/4278984/04279020.pdf
- Re: Academic qualification level, (continued)
Re: Academic qualification level, MJ Ray, 2008/02/04
Re: exposing actual work, Davi Leal, 2008/02/05
Re: exposing actual work, Davi Leal, 2008/02/23