[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cookies vs http authentication
From: |
Chris Carpita |
Subject: |
Re: cookies vs http authentication |
Date: |
Fri, 9 May 2008 10:20:27 -0400 |
Basic auth is more or less fool-proof, best for internal audiences,
and it is encrypted only over SSL.
On Fri, May 9, 2008 at 7:00 AM, Dion Rasmussen <address@hidden> wrote:
> Sure,
>
> Just the Basic authentication across an SSL connection.
>
> Of course you could also use secure session cookies.
>
> Regards :)
>
> On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:02 PM, Davi Leal <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> Could you reply the below pending question?
>>
>>
>> Davi Leal wrote:
>> > Dion Rasmussen wrote:
>> > > Furthermore the standard HTTP authentication can be used with eventual
>> > > secure socket layer constraints instead of relying on cookies for
>> > > security.
>> >
>> > There are several HTTP authentication methods. What specific one do you
>> > think the project should use?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GnuHerds-app-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnuherds-app-dev
>
>
- Re: DB vs FS based webapp architectures -- web 2.0 -- RSS, etc., (continued)
- Re: DB vs FS based webapp architectures -- web 2.0 -- RSS, etc., Dave Crossland, 2008/05/19
- Re: web 2.0, Davi Leal, 2008/05/19
- Re: OpenID, Davi Leal, 2008/05/31
- Re: DB vs FS, Davi Leal, 2008/05/08
- Re: DB vs FS, Dion Rasmussen, 2008/05/09
- Re: cookies vs http authentication, Davi Leal, 2008/05/08
- Re: cookies vs http authentication, Dion Rasmussen, 2008/05/09
- Re: cookies vs http authentication,
Chris Carpita <=
- Re: Cookie-over-HTTPS vs HTTP authentication, Davi Leal, 2008/05/09