gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gnumed status


From: Hilmar Berger
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gnumed status
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2003 22:21:14 +0100 (CET)


On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

> > +-----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
> > |Module                       |related files              |status  
> > |maintainer|
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |Command line interface       |gmCLI                      |pre-beta|karsten 
> >   |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |Client configuration         |gmCfg                      |pre-beta|karsten 
> >   |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |I18N                         |gmI18N                     |pre-beta|karsten 
> >   |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> > |Error/Status Logging         |gmLog                      |pre-beta|karsten 
> >   |
> > |-----------------------------+---------------------------+--------+----------|
> If anyone knows of any major bugs/problems in these that
> prevent them from being considered beta quality I'd like to
> know about it right now :-)
>
> I haven't found a bug in quite a while and I DO employ them in
> nearly any of my projects whether GnuMed related or not.
>
> One criticism could be that there's no formalized test suite
> for them.
Today I tried to extend gmCfg and tested some settings that are not used
usually. Some bugs / features showed up that need further
work/investigation (I will check in changes within few days).
I therefore suggest that each piece of code has to be tested within gnumed
*and* within a reasonable testsuite before setting status to beta quality.

Hilmar







reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]