[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnumed-devel] Re: allergies table
From: |
Andreas Tille |
Subject: |
[Gnumed-devel] Re: allergies table |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Apr 2003 14:39:53 +0200 (CEST) |
On Mon, 7 Apr 2003, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> a doctor on the German list raised the question whether it be
> beneficial to record ongoing or previous hyposensibilization
> treatment pertaining to a particular allergy. What's your
> thinking ? I'd say yes but am unsure as to how and where to
> put it in the table.
I guess in the same record as the allergy because I think that
a hyposensibilization will be done only to those allergies the
patient is suffering from - so this record has to exist.
> Is it necessary to show
> supposedly-inactive allergies (due to having been treated) or
> is it safe to just drop them from the table ? IMHO not.
IMHO also not. My wife and me suffer from hay fever. We have
got a hyposensibilization and it is now much better but we continue
to suffer from this allergy and I think a field hyposensibilization
should have some certain states which might be:
completely successfull
successful
much better than before
better than before
unchanged
worse (? if this might be possible)
or kind of this.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
Mankind must put an end to war before war puts an end to mankind.
John F. Kennedy