[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance |
Date: |
Mon, 7 Jun 2004 19:10:59 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> There is connection pooling for read-only connections.
> Transactions are committed at a *connection* level, a stupid limitation of
> the
> backend libraries. A connection does not allow isolated concurrent
> transactions, and pooling writeable connections would require disciplined
> formal release of the connection after the transaction has been completed.
>
> Maybe we should have another look at SQL Relay.
"Most" queries will be read-only, IMO. And right now (where we
are experiencing slowness) we hardly have any writes yet. I
don't think it'll help too much at the moment to pool writing
connections. And it can be added transparently to gmPG fairly
trivially.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- [Gnumed-devel] re: low performance, sjtan, 2004/06/06
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, sjtan, 2004/06/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Horst Herb, 2004/06/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Ian Haywood, 2004/06/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Sebastian Hilbert, 2004/06/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Jim Busser, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Horst Herb, 2004/06/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: low performance, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/06/14