[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] re : experimental editor
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] re : experimental editor |
Date: |
Mon, 5 Jul 2004 11:25:40 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> but things have moved on , and K has decided to obsolete the code
> that was done , AFAIK.
I have to decided to not use it except for drawing ideas
(which I did believe it or not). I can't obsolete it. This is
GNU, as you said.
> There is also currently a SOAP attribute that cuts
> across all clin_root_items,
> even those of clin_history, clin_physical and clin_working_diagnosis
And which obsoletes the need for clin_history/clin_physical.
They can be folded into clin_narrative with soap_cat=...
This will rid us of the ability to record data sources but I
am not sure we'll need it. And we can add it again later.
> part of S, O, and A respectively, and I suppose this leaves vaccination
> , which is almost always P,
Which is why there's a default 'p' on that table.
> clin_note and clin_aux_note, which are the only 2 subclasses of
> clin_root_item that would seem to need
clin_note has been expanded to be clin_narrative, the type of
narrative being declared by soap_cat. clin_aux_note should be
used sparingly for when a table *really* needs one more
narrative field.
> the SOAP attribute mandatorily). Where in the current schema do actions
> such as ordering investigations,
> and prescribing go ?
Nowhere yet at all.
Oh, ordering lab work goes in lab_request.
Some work on storing referral orders is being done by Ian.
> Artefacts produced from clin_root_items that are 'objective' -
> clin_physical , lab_request -
> can be stored in test_result - N.B. even quantitative physical
> findings, are a form of test_result, e.g. BP measurement, thermometer
> reading.
Sure, quantifyable findings should be stored in test_result.
> This structure seems good enough to hold everything except the script
> prescription, and procedures.
What does "procedures" encompass ?
> With clin_episode, the main reason I can see for it's existence is that
> it makes it easy to shift a whole lot of
> different clin_root_items attached to it from one health issue to
> another, so it provides the ability to deal
> with a problem when the actual health_issue is not defined yet, but will
> be over time.
That is the technical reason. The medical reason is that it
sorts data according to clinical episodes.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346