[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1
From: |
Richard Terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 08:13:27 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:24 am, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > The rest have either had public or commercial (enterprise) funding,
> > yes? And though drug ref may not be "funded" (I am not sure), it has
> > had help from OSCAR (and possibly other agencies) which is/are funded.
>
> Funding isn't sufficient. There must also be people to fund.
>
> > At this point I am really envying Wikipedia's help by Google if that
> > goes through. GnuMed surely will need more help to be successful... I
> > worry that if it is only/mainly Karsten, Ian, Carlos with bits of
> > Hilmar, Horst, Andreas then by the time a prototype is workable
> > (three to five years) the landscape may have changed dramatically. No
> > doubt in my mind that GnuMed has *got* to be funded, if not directly,
> > then indirectly (as I hope my pilot can help do if only in a small
> > way, like a packet of crackers before a meal :-)).
> >
> > Have we real disagreement on the point?
Yeah, nice to see my name is not included.
The main reason a prototype isn't running is that no-one will agree on someone
to take control, direct the program, decided on a gui, and start making it
work. 6 Months would kill it if the programming resources were correctly
aimed.
Regards
Richard
>
> No we don't. (I don't disagree, that is.)
>
> Karsten
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), J Busser, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Tim Churches, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1,
Richard Terry <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Richard Terry, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Ian Haywood, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21
- demographics (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), J Busser, 2005/02/22
- demographics (was: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), J Busser, 2005/02/22
- Re: demographics (was: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21