[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1
From: |
Richard Terry |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:25:25 +1100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5.4 |
I approach this entirely differently from you Karsten, ie that of
funcitonality.
The way I would do it is as thus.
1) Get demographics working (do nothing else until it is) and demonstrate you
can load a patient.
2) Choose an easy section like Family History. Do nothing else until you can
enter data on the screen, clear the data, save to the list
Next save the record to the database, and re-display it, and prove that
this
works. Next modify the record, and prove your modifications work. Next delte
the record and prove that works. Put it back in again and then add a few
more. When entirely thrashed out do the next section
3) Pick say the scratch pad - do as above
4) Pick recalls, do as above, vaccinations etc. Leave the difficult ones to
last ie script.
But everyone works on this - It's no use running off developing other more
complicated areas until you can do the basics.
Eventually even some of your underlying table stuctures are going to have to
be changed, becuase though theoretically correct, I guarrentee you they will
not work properly in practice.
etc etc. Anyway, you get my drift.
Regards
Richard
On Fri, 18 Feb 2005 06:07 pm, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > > > Have we real disagreement on the point?
> >
> > Yeah, nice to see my name is not included.
>
> That was surely not intentional.
>
> > The main reason a prototype isn't running is that no-one will agree on
> > someone to take control, direct the program, decided on a gui, and start
> > making it work.
>
> The problem word in here is "decide". And then stick to it.
>
> > 6 Months would kill it if the programming resources were correctly
> > aimed.
>
> We have disagreement *here* unless you tell me which resources
> you are talking about.
>
> Karsten
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), J Busser, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Tim Churches, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Richard Terry, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1,
Richard Terry <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Ian Haywood, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21
- demographics (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), J Busser, 2005/02/22
- demographics (was: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), J Busser, 2005/02/22
- Re: demographics (was: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21
- [Gnumed-devel] Some suggestions to make gnumed more efficient, Christoph Becker, 2005/02/21