[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Feb 2005 09:46:42 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> 1) Get demographics working (do nothing else until it is) and demonstrate you
> can load a patient.
We can already load a patient.
However, your point is that we can enter and edit a patient,
too. I agree. 0.1.
> 2) Choose an easy section like Family History. Do nothing else until you can
> enter data on the screen, clear the data, save to the list
> Next save the record to the database, and re-display it, and prove that
> this
> works. Next modify the record, and prove your modifications work. Next delta
> the record and prove that works. Put it back in again and then add a few
> more. When entirely thrashed out do the next section
At least until functional. Then stop. > 0.1
> But everyone works on this - It's no use running off developing other more
> complicated areas until you can do the basics.
I very much agree.
> Eventually even some of your underlying table stuctures are going to have to
> be changed, becuase though theoretically correct, I guarrentee you they will
> not work properly in practice.
That might surely be the case.
> The way I would do it is as thus.
This sounds OK with me. I wonder whether you really have the
preception that I have been doing this very different ?
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), J Busser, 2005/02/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1 (was Time for a major re-think in 2005), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Tim Churches, 2005/02/16
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Richard Terry, 2005/02/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Richard Terry, 2005/02/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, J Busser, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Ian Haywood, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21
- demographics (was Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), J Busser, 2005/02/22
- demographics (was: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), J Busser, 2005/02/22
- Re: demographics (was: Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1), Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/22
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed ideas 0.1 and post-0.1, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21
- [Gnumed-devel] Some suggestions to make gnumed more efficient, Christoph Becker, 2005/02/21
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Some suggestions to make gnumed more efficient, Karsten Hilbert, 2005/02/21