[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] progress note popups
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] progress note popups |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:17:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
On Mon, Apr 25, 2005 at 10:18:29PM +0800, Syan Tan wrote:
> if consultation events had subtypes,
> then change current medication , and issue script, should
> be separate consultation events, which could be record in the EMR.
>
> actually , looking at the book again, change-current-medication, and
> issue-script
> would be instances of an action type class which an action attribute is an
> instance of, since actually subtypes of action
> class would be proposed action, abandoned action, implemented action,
> completed
> action, implemented-but-abandoned action. Probably inheritance is for the
> later
> heirarchy, because there might be additional attributes in the subclasses e.g.
> when abandoned, when implemented, when completed.
>
> The outcomes of an action are observations (a subtype of observation, that
> has a link to a precedent action), according to the book.
All this sounds like what OpenEHR does. We don't, however, have
a metamodel, that is to mean we *implement* actions instead of
*modelling* them (and subsequently executing the model).
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346