Re: [Gnumed-devel] proposal for HL7 v2.3 to gnumed parsing

[Karsten Hilbert]

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 06:34:15PM +1000, Ian Haywood wrote:

[unmatched lab data]
> >Well, using a dummy patient does not preclude a special
> >interface - 
> Yes it does, as we have nowhere to store the provided name and DOB of
> the unmatched result.
Ah, you are correct. One could argue that one might store the
name/DOB in some clin_narrative rows abused for the purpose
but hey, that certainly IS abuse :-))

> Unless you are talking about generating new identity entries for these
> results, I don't need to tell you why this is bad.
No you don't :-)

> EXCEPT for 1 situation: new referral letters sent to a specialist.
Not sure I can follow entirely ?

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346