Re: [Gnumed-devel] unhandled exceptions EMR_MedicalHx_, GNUmed_IFAP, Office_Appts

[James Busser]

On 13-Jan-08, at 1:06 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 12:43:27PM -0800, James Busser wrote:
> > Except even on my local database, when I added past history items  
> > with the
> > EMR tree selected, it did not refresh after a minute. When I clicked
> > Progress notes the item was immediately there, and when I clicked  
> > back on
> > EMR tree it was there. But it appears something extra is required  
> > (at least
> > on mac) to refresh the screen. Does that make sense and does it  
> > appear
> > correct, and not on Windows or Linux?
> Oh that, OK, sorry. That is still true and being worked on
> (even on Windows/Linux).

Then I do not understand what was possible in your "fun" post about  
database change awareness (recopied below) ... how is this change  
awareness manifest? If the user must somehow signal the backend that  
the user wishes their information refreshed, does it make GNUmed  
currently no different than any other EMR?


On 7-Jan-08, at 7:12 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote in Re: [Gnumed-devel]  
fun w/ 0.2.8

> Now that several people have got 0.2.8 running a fun
> experiment is demonstrating the database change awareness of
> the client:
>
> Two people activate the same patient from the public
> database.
>
> One of them edits demographics data, say, the name,
> DOB, or allergies.
>
> The other observes how those values change on *his* client
> in real time responding to edits done by someone else
> possible across continents.