Re: [Gnumed-devel] gnumed schema versions

[Sebastian Hilbert]

On Dienstag 26 Februar 2008, James Busser wrote:
> was Re: [Gnumed-devel] text field "additional_result_info" needed in
> clin.test_result
>
> On 25-Feb-08, at 1:08 PM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 03:25:21PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> >>>>>         additional_result_info
> >>>>
> >>>> Is this not clin.test_result.note_provider ?
> >>>
> >>> I think I tripped on understand what is a "note_provider" ...
> >>
> >> Comment is to generic as there can be other comments, too. I'll go
> >> with "note_test_org".
> >
> > Done.
> >
> >> Now I'll also make the clin.lab_request.test_org nullable since I
> >
> > Done.
>
> I am a bit confused... when I ran the bootstrapper some weeks ago, it
> installed database schema _v8 which I assume was the version of the
> then-current release. When I look at the wiki page for DatabaseSchema
> the links to "release" reveal gnumed_v7 dumped January 7, 2008
> whereas "devel" links to gnumed_v8 dumped February 26.

I think the script that produces the output is not upto date and needs a 
version bump ?
>
> Therefore when Karsten makes a change, as with above, does this
> update an unadvertised _v9 or if it updates _v8, how would someone
> who is already at an (earlier) version of _v8 apply the update?
>
I believe they go into v9. v8 should be stable and if at all only see an 
update if there is a grave bug.

But I am looking forward to Karsten's answer as well.



-- 
Sebastian Hilbert 
Leipzig / Germany
[www.gnumed.de]  -> PGP welcome, HTML ->/dev/null