Re: [Gnumed-devel] state of test results handling

[James Busser]

On 30-Mar-08, at 3:22 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> > - if I correctly interpret that the action of the "Review" widget  
> > will be
> > to "set or reset" the values of all items in the table
> No. All items within the table that are *selected* when the
> review is invoked.

Ah, then the fact that, in the screenshot, the RBC (erythrocytes)  
test name *happened* to form part of the selection is ignored i.e.  
does not limit which results gets "signed"... the latter gets wholly  
determined by the sum of individual cells that happened to be selected.

Within what had been the review widget (being renamed the Sign  
widget) is the sequence of the listing of the results presently  
alphabetic as it seems, explaining why it differs from the sequence  
in which the results were listed?