Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: <bug>: :) first 0.3.2 bug ?? - In production I was

[James Busser]

On 13-Sep-08, at 12:10 PM, Gour wrote:

> By looking at code it looks (I do not have GNUmed 0.3.2 installed atm)
> that there is choice to which address one sends.

Things are not yet smooth:

1. the 0.3.2 client does not appear by default to send auto-generated  
bugs to gnumed-bugs (it does not by default send anywhere... the  
sendto field within the dialog is empty and must be filled-in by the  
user. The current implementation is likely to reduce auto-generated  
bug reports going to gnumed-bugs.

2. the 0.3.2 client does not currently appear to "default" to gnumed- 
bugs even *after* I though I suitably re-configured the tarball conf  
file and then the /etc/gnumed/ conf file values for
        helpdesk
    as already reported yesterday in the email
	Re: [Gnumed-devel] unhandled exceptions and local database "in- 
production"
        http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnumed-devel/2008-09/msg00440.html

3. I did manually address at least one autogenerated bug to gnumed- 
bugs but on leaning that Gour did not see any I discovered that  
gnumed-bugs was set to require moderation for all posts. therefore in  
the queue waiting approval were 3 emails which I have now sent through.

I have also unset the requires-moderation bit for the four currently- 
subscribed addresses (karsten's, mine, the gnumed A'T gmx.net address  
which is used by the unhandled exception auto-emailer and the gnumed  
A'T gmail.com address used by Gour.

I don't anticipate sending anything to gnumed-bugs, except any thing  
that appears to be not-yet-reported 0.3.2 bugs and to send these via  
the unhandled exception auto-emailer.