Re: [Gnumed-devel] unhandled exceptions and local database "in-production"

[James Busser]

On 15-Sep-08, at 2:39 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

> Well,
>
> a) the config file does not define the local database as being  
> "public access"
> b) the client code does not know any other way to know whether a  
> database is "public access"

I only did not remember any such contextual language when I  
previously had a local database running, mind you that was many  
months ago so maybe the contextual language in the unhandled  
exception widget is new or I just don't remember. But the way you now  
have it makes sense, I might only suggest "in-production (?)" instead  
of "in-production" since, as you say, the client code does not know.  
Happy to file if you are inclined to accept the proposal.

> > Also, even though running from tarball lacks configuration where to
> > email the report, the hint currently (even in 0.3.2) is to gnumed-
> > devel and I am understanding the hint should instead be "gnumed-
> > address@hidden".
> 0.3.2 was released before address@hidden was activated. In  
> fact, I didn,t plan to do so before
> Japan but the Wiki page already said so so I thought of the  
> *minimum*-hassle way of enabling what
> the Wiki said :-)   Which is to make it *possible* (even for some  
> values of "default") to post to
> gnumed-bugs...

Thank you for doing what you were able. We have likely covered it off  
anyway on account of messages that would have gone to -devel  
(hopefully) now bouncing to me but maybe I will test that to be sure :-)