[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] 0.3.2 feedback: EMR tree
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] 0.3.2 feedback: EMR tree |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Oct 2008 13:27:15 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
> On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 09:56:09AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
>
> > 7) expression of Foundational Health Issue information in the right
> > panel of the tree
> >
> > I know the english word "foundational" translated well on the devel list
> > but in native use it is long and rather awkward. Considering the
> > simplicity and wisdom ;-) that these issues live in a schema table
> > called "Health issues" I recommend the client should display them named
> > as "Health issues". I suspect the earlier form "foundational" was
> > important as we evolved our way through how undifferentiated symptoms
> > would be captured/reflected by episodes which could get an eventual
> > explanation or attribution (foundational issue) or may not. But now that
> > we can see it in the client I think it is OK and certainly clearer to the
> > user to call the top-level tree items "Health issues".
>
> Done in CVS HEAD.
>
> Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] 0.3.2 feedback: EMR tree,
Karsten Hilbert <=