[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Jul 2009 17:08:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:21:52PM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> Also, the editor provides
>
> a Measurement detail Comment field
> a Clinical context Note field
>
> I think the "comment" is intended to inform the test *context* to better
> guide interpretation of the test, such as "fasting, upright, did not
> fast, on steroids".
>
> I think the "Note" is intended to hold a clinician's assessment of what
> this test means in the care of the patient and/or any action that may be
> needed as a result.
That's right and the tooltip informs as such.
> Where will this datum live?
Both live inside the test result row in the table.
> It is rather like a soAp row, is it not?
It is. In fact, the clinical context note is, technically,
the .comment field of the clin.test_results table which is a
child of clin.clin_root_item, just like any other
soap-row-like table. So, in a sense, it IS a sOap row.
> In terms of tweaking the "edit measurement" window can we
> --> left-justify "Measurement details"
> --> left-justify "Clinical context"
> --> left-justify "Reference information" or refactor it?
not completely, only flush with the input fields, not the labels
Refactor, how ?
> --> change "Comment" to "Context"
> --> rename above "Clinical context" to "Clinical details"
> --> change "Note" to "Assessment" though it needs shrinking the field
> widths
Done.
> It seems to me it would help greatly to relocate the reference
> information rows to place them immediately under the Date despite that
> the Comment would then be moved down as the bottom row of this cluster.
> We would thus get rid of the label "reference information"...
I don't think so. I think it is useful to have the mandatory
fields up top.
> besides it
> appears the user is permitted to input missing values for the reference
> information as I have just done in this screenshot.
Sure, why not ?
> In the EMR Journal can we change corresponding
> --> "MTA" to "Context:"
> --> "Doc:" to "Assessment:"
Done.
> and indent the second-through-last rows per-measurement with a space
Not trivially.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Ubuntu was Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, (continued)
- Ubuntu was Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Jim Busser, 2009/07/06
- Re: Ubuntu was Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Sebastian Hilbert, 2009/07/07
- Re: Ubuntu was Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Jim Busser, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Jim Busser, 2009/07/06
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Sebastian Hilbert, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Sebastian Hilbert, 2009/07/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Jim Busser, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Sebastian Hilbert, 2009/07/08
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/07/08
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Measurements selection, formatting, behaviour,
Karsten Hilbert <=