gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: 0.5.rc4 Address entry issues


From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: 0.5.rc4 Address entry issues
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 23:12:52 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 01:12:42PM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:

> Actually, based on my observation of 0.5.rc4 behaviour, an entirely
> new address is created *and* this new address is assigned to the
> newly created person.

Only if the address values are at all edited. If they are
not the address will be re-used. If it is not that's a bug.

> So there is not even a white lie. I would say,
> in the now-labeled-"Search (modify)" field tooltip:
> 
> >>    "A value here, with any modification(s) below, will be saved as
> >>an assumed "home" address.

That is not really true either. Even without any value in
the Search field one can just enter the relevant details
below it and create a new address from it without ever
exercising the Search phrasewheel. Even then an existing
address of exactly the same details would be re-used.

Technically correct would be:

        Either this address here (if values remain unchanged
        below) OR a new address created from the details below
        is linked to the patient as the home address.

The white lie IMO would be to say "A value here, with
modifications below, will be saved" because IF there ARE
modifications "a value here" will NOT be saved - despite the
details and "a value here" possible matching perfectly
except for that modification.

White lie because it won't matter to the user, I'd have thunk ?

Karsten
-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]