[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note |
Date: |
Sat, 7 Nov 2009 21:52:59 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 09:33:22PM +0100, Hilbert, Sebastian wrote:
> > > Karsten, if the affected row were to be refused access permissions
> >
> > This is not easily possible. PostgreSQL so far does not
> > natively support row level access permissions.
> >
> All I could find is that
> http://bytes.com/topic/postgresql/answers/422181-row-level-security-possible
Again, natively it doesn't support it. PG only recently (8.4
I think) gained *column* level permissions.
There is a system called "Veil" which puts a layer of views
on top of the normal views / tables in which the WHERE
clause validates against permissions set in other tables.
This is quite effective and is my preferred solution when we
attempt to implement this fully.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Sebastian Hilbert, 2009/11/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Jim Busser, 2009/11/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Jim Busser, 2009/11/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/11/07
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Jim Busser, 2009/11/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/11/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Jim Busser, 2009/11/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Verbus Counts, 2009/11/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/11/11
Re: [Gnumed-devel] CCHIT - access restrictions per SOAP note, Karsten Hilbert, 2009/11/07