2010/7/4 Karsten Hilbert
<address@hidden>
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 05:41:55PM -0300, Rogerio Luz Coelho wrote:
> 2nd - Wishlist:
>
> I would like to see in the future the Problem List with a separator:
> Chronic / Acute
> This is somewhat done by the client already by the "grouping" of problems,
> but my thinking would b e as follows:
>
> - first the problem list could have a difference in permissions for
> modifications in the Chronic list and a Acute list where even Dr.Joe can
> make encounters and episodes. This is specially interesting in settings
> where we have a Clinical Ambulatory and a ER in the same setting or sharing
> the same EMR.
>
> - second this facilitates the job of doctors while browsing the EMR -
> besides, acute diagnostics generally aren´t supposed to be that precise ...
Rogerio, this is what I wrote back then:
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 01:52:09PM +0200, Hilbert, Sebastian wrote:
>
> > Anyone up to creating this for GNUmed ?
> > https://medsphere.org/docs/DOC-1778
>
> Problem list.
>
> This shows how Vista seems to consider it a good idea to
> support an immediacy flag on problems.
>
> The German GP research also knows this flag.
>
> Do you see value in supporting
>
> clin.health_issue.immediacy
> clin.episode.immediacy
>
> ? Values would be NULL (undecided), chronic, and acute.
>
> We already sort of support this except from a different
> angle:
>
> clin.health_issue.is_active
This flag cannot tell which of the active problems is
chronic but it can tell that inactive problems are NOT
chronic :-)
Does that suffice ?
After all, any problem that is thought active warrants
attention, regardless of being chronic or not.
I don´t think it sufices, and I was REALLY hoping for a PHYSICAL separator in the problem list
like :
Chronic:
x
y
z
____________
Acute
e
f
z - acute episode
Rogerio