[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas
From: |
Sebastian Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Jul 2010 07:54:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.3 (Linux/2.6.33-6-desktop; KDE/4.4.5; i686; ; ) |
Am Freitag 09 Juli 2010, 23:43:07 schrieb lkcl:
Hi Luke,
Great to have you here.
> Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > supposedly going through a language-to-Javascript compiler
> > will fail badly in case of a bug
>
> this is *precisely* why we have the unit tests, of which there are about
> 3,000, and the ultimate aim is to run the entire python regression test
> suite (under pyv8 - not in a browser of course). nothing goes in to the
> pyjs compiler without a unit test to back it up.
>
> http://pyjs.org/examples/libtest/output/LibTest.html
>
Good to know. I picked up that argument in the beginning of my research from
some website. It might not hold true for pyjamas and was uttered with regards
to GWT
> Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > various techniques including Json and RPC exist but there is no consensus
> > or benchmarks
> >
> > designer applications
> > the widely used frameworks such as extJS and ZK have designer
> > applications available which would allow non-coders to produce pseudo
> > code or mock ups.
>
> it's very new but pyjsglade does exist. it's a GUI editing tool, similar
> to gtk glade.
>
Ah. Nice to know. I was told that those tools are mostly a starting point and
when you want to do something more complex you are going to to it by hand
anyway.
> Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
> > So far I have found nothing that fits the bill. In case of Pyjamas I am
> > unsure
> > about its future and its set of widgets.
>
> why? i'm never going back to HTML/CSS / javascript programming - ever.
> there are enough people if i get hit by a bus, such as greg, kees and so
> on, to continue working on it.
>
This is the information I was looking for. Thanks.
> there's a roadmap and everything.
>
> the chances of me abandoning pyjamas for "the next best thing" are pretty
> much zero. i will add extra runtimes (giving serious thought to making
> pyjamas run under silverlight, porting it to IronPython!) but i will _not_
> be going back to the sheer insanity of HTML, CSS and javascript browser
> incompatibility. it's simply too awful to contemplate, once you've used
> something like pyjamas.
>
Meanwhile having read your other comments (thanks for that) I personally see
pyjamas as a viable solution. Unfortunately there is noone on the team who can
produce a proof of concept (or noone has said so at least).
I did the research to make it easier for someone else to start and to avoid
having to do the research. Right now I am more then busy with some GNUmed
features to implement.
If anyone else could come up with at proof of concept done in pyjamas that
would be great.
Sebastian
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - to framework or not to framework, lkcl, 2010/07/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas,
Sebastian Hilbert <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, lkcl, 2010/07/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, lkcl, 2010/07/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, lkcl, 2010/07/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, Jim Busser, 2010/07/10
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed web interface - pyjamas, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/11