gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] Formatting of SOAP row and metadata


From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Formatting of SOAP row and metadata
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 19:34:20 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

I think we need more opinions on this.

Karsten

On Thu, Jul 21, 2011 at 09:25:50AM -0700, Jim Busser wrote:
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2011 09:25:50 -0700
> From: Jim Busser <address@hidden>
> To: Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] Formatting of SOAP row and metadata
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
> 
> On 2011-07-21, at 2:51 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> 
> >> Shown at both the level of the Health Issue (screenshot 1) and at the 
> >> level of the Episode (screenshot 2).
> > 
> > This does not show that the episode name is show multiple
> > times with each encounter as far as I can see ?
> 
> My error in that the multiple times may not have been per encounter.
> 
> I am only questioning the value of displaying the episode name at all.
> 
> 1) when EMR tree focus is on one episode, displaying that episode name even 
> one time (let alone multiple times) in the right pane is redundant
> 
> 2) when EMR tree focus is on a Health Issue, I am still not convinced there 
> is value to displaying the episode names in the right sided output. Opening 
> the EMR tree will show the episode names,  and anyone who wants to review the 
> record will have a focus on the SOAP notes and not the 'derived' episode 
> names.
> 
> Therefore why not just remove the episode names from the right-sided output?
> 
> Also redundant is the issue information.
> 
> ??
> 
> -- Jim
> _______________________________________________
> Gnumed-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel

-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ gpg-keyserver.de
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]