[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview
From: |
Busser, Jim |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Dec 2011 18:58:02 +0000 |
On 2011-12-19, at 10:45 AM, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
> There's not really any use coloring document items if the
> documents panel only ever contains unsigned ones unless one
> wants to make a distinction between "unsigend *ab*normal"
> and "unsigned normal" ?
I suppose it begs the question, which I do not recall having been discussed, as
to the basis for inclusion (filtering) of *any* of the overview panels.
It never occurred to me that any of the overview panels would show *only* what
had not been signed.
Anything which had not yet been signed:
- is currently (at least in some cases) intended to be visible in the Inbox
- is currently (at least in some cases) filterable inside the respective
(measurements, documents) plugin
My concept of the overview is that it would allow *not only* the primary
provider but *any other clinician* in the praxis (who may need to provide care):
- an effective introduction to the patient's health (if the patient is new to
that individual) or
- a reminder of what may already be known
i.e. not *just* the things which had not yet been signed.
-- Jim
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, (continued)
Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/19
Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/19
[Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/12/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview,
Busser, Jim <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/12/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/12/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Busser, Jim, 2011/12/19
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] patient overview, Karsten Hilbert, 2011/12/19