Re: [Gnumed-devel] Challenges in lab test aggregation - panels

[Busser, Jim]

On 2013-09-08, at 9:50 AM, Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Sun, Sep 08, 2013 at 04:32:01PM +0000, Jim Busser wrote:
> 
>> But what about the tests which had *not* been aggregated
>> under a test type?
> 
> The database acts as if they had their own meta test type
> defined. IOW, they are "linked" to a virtual meta test type.
> Each to their own.

Therefore …

1) a need for a designated common "base" unit, within meta test type (per meta 
test type), to serve as an "arbiter" when the components of a meta type each 
(possibly) had a different unit, and 

2) if (1) is needed, then is it still useful to maintain within test_types a 
separate "base" unit?

-- Jim