[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release --> inbox selector / results
From: |
Busser, Jim |
Subject: |
[Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release --> inbox selector / results clarifications |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Jan 2015 20:17:05 +0000 |
was: Re: [Gnumed-bugs] [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release - inbox
shows *old* unsigned documents
On 2015-01-21, at 2:01 PM, Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 10:37:49PM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>
>>> 3) with "Relevant" selected, clicking "Only: [ ] Active patient" makes no
>>> difference
>>
>> Hm, I have to check that.
>
> I can't really see anything odd in the code. We'll have to
> look at the SQL being logged.
In case this helps …
Inbox, with none among the checkboxes "Active patient" or "Yours" selected,
shows
Relevant: 4
All: 2
Overdue: 2
Scheduled: 2
Unscheduled: 0
Expired: 0
yet there are 8 in the actual dem.message_inbox table (see below) which made me
wonder whether the GUI label "All" is meant to mean
Messages directed to all users
and not
All inbox messages
in which case the label should be
To all
and making me wonder … when an inbox message is chosen to be sent to "All", is
the result a 'cloning' of the message, one per staff?
Separately I think there does exist a use case worth supporting, to be able to
see at least a listing of another user's messages.
For example if a staff who lacks remote access to GNUmed phones in, and asks if
there are any messages for them, it would be reasonable for a staff who is not
the intended recipient to be able to see this out-of-praxis user's message
listing. Even, probably, the Message comment which shows in the column view
(but not the message detail).
My reason for suspecting the latter would be acceptable is because any message
which came in from the outside would have been taken by a reception staff, who
through common sense or training would differentiate the message comment from
the detail e.g.
Call your home ASAP
There is a problem , at school, with your son
and anyone in the praxis generating a staff-to-staff message could do the same
thing. Or, it could be decided to allow users ability to list (see) other
users' inbox messages to be limited to the clinical category. Or maybe some of
this could be praxis-configurable.
-- Jim
PS if I log in as McCoy, I do see all 8 messages, along with 3 additional
auto-generated messages.
gnumed_v20=> select pk, modified_by, fk_staff, fk_patient,left(comment, 20)
from dem.message_inbox ;
pk | modified_by | fk_staff | fk_patient | left
----+-------------+----------+------------+----------------------
8 | gm-dbo | 1 | | Release Notes for GN
10 | gm-dbo | 1 | | Staff member Karsten
6 | gm-dbo | 1 | 32 | dictate Chris Sederg
19 | gm-dbo | 1 | | next medical exam fo
20 | gm-dbo | 1 | | Release Notes for GN
29 | gm-dbo | 1 | | Release Notes for GN
30 | gm-dbo | 1 | | Release Notes for GN
31 | gm-dbo | 1 | | Release Notes for GN
(8 rows)
-- end
- [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release, Karsten Hilbert, 2015/01/08
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release --> inbox selector / results clarifications,
Busser, Jim <=
Re: [Gnumed-devel] GNUmed 1.5.0 Feature Release, Busser, Jim, 2015/01/28