|
From: | Kevin Atkinson |
Subject: | Re: [GNUnet-developers] gdbm patch |
Date: | Sun, 5 May 2002 15:34:33 -0400 (EDT) |
Why gdbm and not Berkley DB? I image Berkley DB will be more efficient and flexible since it is actively maintained unlike gdbm which hasn't been updated since 1999. Berkley DB is under a GPL compatible license. See. http://www.sleepycat.com/ I don't really care. Just wondering. -- http://kevin.atkinson.dhs.org
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |