Re: [GNUnet-developers] avoiding openssl, take 2

[bmatheny]

First of all, OpenSSL is the defacto standard currently for a crypto API. Until 
that changes I think it's a "Good Thing" to support it. Also, as with the 
network support and file support, GNUnet is extensible and provides options for 
it's users. I'm not a big fan of being tied to any one software. What do you 
mean by 'more optimized versions of openssl'?

-Blake

Quoting Wayne Scott <address@hidden>:

> Question:
> 
> The reasons to avoid openssl are pretty clear.
> 
> But if you find an alternative using GPL or LGPL libraries, why not
> just use them exclusively?  Why support either library?
> Do more optimized versions of openssl exist?
> 
> -Wayne
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>