gnunet-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUtls


From: Blake Matheny
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUtls
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2002 17:59:36 -0500

Ian Murdock is a keynote at a conference I'm going to this weekend, we'll 
settle the GNUtls issue once and for all :-)

-Blake

On Monday 14 October 2002 17:48, Glenn McGrath wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Oct 2002 13:07:57 -0500
>
> Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Monday 14 October 2002 10:50 am, Stephan Hepper wrote:
> > > hi there,
> > >
> > > i've got a question about GNUnet.
> > > is it possible to replace OpenSSL with GNUtls?
> > > i'd like to do that if it would be possible...
> >
> > I don't know GNUtls well enough. If it's ciphers are bit-wise
> > compatible, this should be possible. All calls to OpenSSL are in the
> > src/util package and should be easy to #ifdef to call GNUtls instead.
>
> Hi all
>
> I have looked into it previously, GNUtls has the functionality, and
> #defines could be used, however it may be easier to replace complete
> functions with GNUtls based code rather than defining around individual
> commands.
>
> The catch with openssl is that GNUnet uses it also to pass the config
> file, so a GNUtls would need to use another library (e.g. libcfg+) to pass
> the GNUnet's config file.
>
> I got bogged down trying to work it out and put it on the backburner, but
> Stephen if your still keen i would like to help out.
>
>
>
> Glenn
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]