gnunet-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet-0.5.4 on Solaris 9


From: Christian Grothoff
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet-0.5.4 on Solaris 9
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2003 14:45:11 -0500
User-agent: KMail/1.4.3

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Friday 06 June 2003 02:22 pm, you wrote:
> --- Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Thursday 05 June 2003 08:34 pm, Kenneth Stailey wrote:
> > > The same problem with -R happened with glib but it's so messy.  The
> > > problem is that "glib-config -libs" does not spit out the -R option
> > > even though it is a requirement.
> >
> > But these are not problems with GNUnet. These are problems with the C++
> > compiler or glib (or your glib installation???). It is really bad to
> > hardwire paths like /usr/local into configure.ac; and in fact, I did not
> > have to do this on the Solaris 8 machine that I have access to. Also note
> > that GNUnet does not require C++, so I'm not sure where all of this
> > libstdc++.so stuff is coming from. libextractor uses C++ (in the PDF
> > extractor), maybe you're confusing something here?
>
> The GNUnet 0.5.4 configure.ac has:
>
> # Checks for programs.
> AC_PROG_CXX
>
> which will try to build a program linking in libstdc++.so stuff.
>
> Please take out 'AC_PROG_CXX' from configure.ac if you are not using C++.

Done.

> Thanks.

No problem.

> > I don't have access to Solaris 9, so of course you may have some problems
> > that relate exclusively to that OS.
>
> The problem is that /usr/local/lib is not searched by default and Solaris
> has never had anything like ldconfig(8).  You can either setup an
> environment varible called LD_LIBRARY_PATH which is bad I think for
> security or you can link with -R
> /path/to/shared/lib:/another/path/to/more/shared/libs
>
> There are other Solaris 9 issues I think:

Yes, they have been reported and fixed in CVS:
https://www.ovmj.org/~mantis/bug_view_page.php?bug_id=0000482

Christian
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE+4O9I9tNtMeXQLkIRAiHwAJ9wwjj9PeDUSZzcbuyxuXmwFTN8vQCgmpWB
vewSx2WnGiF5wbp/Jys3b28=
=OvYb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]