Re: [GNUnet-developers] Re: [Help-gnunet] trouble with cvs

[Marcos D. Marado Torres]

Furthermore, what if GNUnet has dependences on tols that aren't in a final
release yet? GNUnet isn't either!

Mind Booster Noori

--
==================================================
Marcos Daniel Marado Torres AKA Mind Booster Noori
/"\               http://student.dei.uc.pt/~marado
\ /                       address@hidden
 X   ASCII Ribbon Campaign
/ \  against HTML e-mail and Micro$oft attachments
==================================================

On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Christian Grothoff wrote:

> On Friday 07 November 2003 01:47 am, Igor Wronsky wrote:
> > On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, N. Durner wrote:
> > > > ltdl.c:2174: warning: `struct direct' declared inside parameter list
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > > What now? O:-)
> > >
> > > What version of libtool are you using?
> > > If it is < 1.5, please try to update to 1.5.
> > > Hope this helps,
> >
> > Btw, is there some reason why other software packages can
> > manage with build scripts that rely on utils from typical
> > *stable* distributions, but we need all this bleeding edge
> > stuff that no-one in their sane mind has? :)
>
> CVS is for people who want to do development (which, btw means that by
> definition that they are insane :-), so they should have enough of a clue to
> install the latest autotools.  Furthermore, CVS is to be expected to be
> unstable (that's why it is not a release), so if is ok if it has problems in
> some settings. I'm happy if they get reported, but I don't think we have to
> ensure that it is always trivial to make CVS run.
>
> Most of the current problems steam from the fact that the new gnunet-setup
> tool still needs some integration work and that libtool 1.5 causes some
> problems. But since libtool 1.5 helps Nils to make things work under Win32
> (and shows us problems that we'd have to face at some point anyway), that's a
> good enough reason for me to bite that bullet.  Not to mention that the
> latest stable libtool seems to have vanished in the big gnu-ftp server
> break-in purge (at least last time I checked it was still 'missing').
>
> C
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
> ------------ Output from gpg ------------
> gpg: WARNING: using insecure memory!
> gpg: please see http://www.gnupg.org/faq.html for more information
> gpg: Signature made Fri 07 Nov 2003 07:22:48 PM WET using DSA key ID E5D02E42
> gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found
>
>