Re: [GNUnet-developers] gnunet-gtk crashes

[Christian Grothoff]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tuesday 16 December 2003 10:01 am, Igor Wronsky wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Tom Barnes-Lawrence wrote:
> > mneh, I suppose that must be true, but I still generally avoid using CVS.
> > Remind me, the current CVS version now uses 2 separate config files, does
> > it have other changes, eg to the directory heirarchy, data formats,etc
> > that I'd need to know about first?
>
> My humble and inconsequental opinion is that the gnunet project
> has failed to produce an entirely satisfying release version, ever.

That's why it is called 'beta' and not 'stable'.

> Or if it has, I can't remember the occasion. :) Maybe someday.
> The current situation is that 0.6.0a has some serious problems,
> and everyone would be better off with the current CVS version. Of
> course this recommendation can't be made general - the CVS might
> be totally blasted any day. :)

I'm not sure I can say which of the recent release-critical bugs in the last 
week you are talking about here (pick from cron, nat / transport and 
recursive OPEN) :-).  

Oh, and Igor, I'm fine if you want to make a release -- just take CVS, iterate 
"test-(fix|complain)" until you think its stable 'enough', package the 
tar-ball, write anouncements and upload.  At this point, I plan on first 
"finishing" some new features (NAT, possibly more of testbed) before spending 
the time on doing a release, but that does not have to stop anyone else. :-)

C

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/4gXm9tNtMeXQLkIRAlLoAJ43RnoE2eF4MDOkpTeJxXsbGdHUfgCffO7W
j0JK8EITd3x7kj/V4rw9NVg=
=uyr3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----