[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Chat System, again
From: |
Marcos D. Marado Torres |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Chat System, again |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Oct 2004 19:43:25 +0100 (WEST) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 3 Oct 2004, Christian Grothoff wrote:
One peer responsible for routing is what i proposed above and am not
very happy with.
How about a pool of peers?
Why not have everyone in a channel know where to send to?
Depends on where you want to scale -- sending 1000 messages to 1000
participants might not be such a great idea. But then again, 1000 might be
the upper end for chat systems anyway, so I don't have any serious objections
to that.
Well, once again if we use the same approach as talkers (yes, I know I have to
update wikipedia on talkers) we don't even get 1000 users but only an
USER_LIMIT "per talker" (then talkers may be connected to each other), and
usually USER_LIMIT is set to 50 (although I would rather use 30).
Mind Booster Noori
- --
/* *************************************************************** */
Marcos Daniel Marado Torres AKA Mind Booster Noori
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~marado - address@hidden
() Join the ASCII ribbon campaign against html email, Microsoft
/\ attachments and Software patents. They endanger the World.
Sign a petition against patents: http://petition.eurolinux.org
/* *************************************************************** */
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Made with pgp4pine 1.76
iD8DBQFBdWBOmNlq8m+oD34RAqtFAJ9KOX/p5EyTMclXJP+9vSna8NXxggCgmL4S
cxcQDJven/aqzEgmcmirPUY=
=YPG6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----