[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Mar 2019 21:29:47 +0000 |
Christian Grothoff transcribed 3.0K bytes:
> We should just deploy a Git hook to reject pushes if they contain tabs
> in .c or .h files, that should work as a minimal fix, right? -C
No leading tabs, No trailing whitespace,
and no tabs at all?
Or simply no tabs?
I can arrange that either before or after the 18th (more likely after).
> On 3/13/19 9:03 PM, Schanzenbach, Martin wrote:
> > I don't like changing somebody else's lines just for intendation because it
> > messes with git blame.
> > So I think it is better to hold people to the coding style.
>
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [GNUnet-developers] Please review: C implementation of gnunet-qr, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/03
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Please review: C implementation of gnunet-qr, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/03
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Please review: C implementation of gnunet-qr, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/03
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected,
ng0 <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, IC Rainbow, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Christian Grothoff, 2019/03/15
- [GNUnet-developers] .dir-local.el for all/most repos, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/15
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/13
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Hartmut Goebel, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, ng0, 2019/03/14
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUNET_PROGRAM* option evaluation does not work as expected, Schanzenbach, Martin, 2019/03/14