gnunet-developers
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [GNUnet-developers] Discussion, and Help Wanted: Moving to Gitlab fo


From: Devan C. - dvn
Subject: Re: [GNUnet-developers] Discussion, and Help Wanted: Moving to Gitlab for Git, CI, and Issues
Date: Sat, 6 Apr 2019 08:01:42 -0700

address@hidden transcribed 7.5K bytes:
> Devan C. dvn transcribed 6.5K bytes:
> > Current Gitlab status:
> > 
> > - Gitlab is running and accessible at `https://gitlab.gnunet.org`
> 
> So here's a problem I see with this as it is right now:
> I'm a git admin. Before I give people a certain kind of access, be
> it for one repo only, a range of repos or the group 'gnunet', I
> have a sort of checklist. Can I digitally verify to some extent that the
> key sent to me matches the person? Do we have a CAA signature? etc.
> Now I see already one name as 'Owner' in the gnunet group who, to
> my knowledge, has never signed anything. Correct me if I'm wrong
> about ic.rbow.

I should have mentioned: The current "GNUnet" group was created by wldhx
to test the runners, and I am planning to rename or delete it before
importing all of the repos.

> We can only trust each other.
> Since we have this CAA in place, we need more than trust, we need
> some guidelines when someone is added to which permission level
> in gitlab.
> Previously the communication about what happened, which steps
> were followed and that there is a new committer, were betwee
> 1 or 2 people involved in administration. Now potentially everyone
> can do this, which is either bad or good, so at the very least
> we need to communicate about new rights given.

As wldhx noted, the group persmissions should work largely the
same as with gitolite. I think Owners of the whole Group should be
limited, as we have had it, and there can be different Owners of 
various repos.

>  
> > - Registration is open. There are no guarantees on uptime, or even
> >   data retention (though I don't expect data to disappear).
> > 
> > - wldhx has kindly offered two "Gitlab Runners" for running CI jobs.
> >   These will be added as shared runners, to be used by any projects on
> >   the instance. This may be changed later to only be shared by projects
> >   under the GNUnet namespace.
> > 
> >  **TODO**
> > 
> > - Setup email. Used for registration, password resets,
> >   notifcations, and interaction (eg. issue threads).
> > 
> > - Currently run using containers with docker-compose. Will switch to
> > using systemd services to with the containers, removing docker-compose.
> > 
> > - Daily remote backups. Perhaps 'firefly.gnunet.org' could be the backup
> >   site, hmm?
> > 
> > - Change configured hostname (in Gitlab) to 'gitlab.gnunet.org'.
> > 
> > - Setup redirect from 'git.gnunet.org' -> 'gitlab.gnunet.org'
> > ----
> > 
> > Current [MantisBT -> Gitlab Issues] status:
> > 
> > Exporting:
> > - Mantis can export to CSV and "Excell" XML
> >   - These do not contain comments (bugnotes). It looks like there might
> >     be a possibility to enable them via a configuration option[2]. Not
> >     sure who all has admin access, whom I could coordinate with. Maybe
> >     easier if I can get admin rights? Grothoff, what do you think?
> > 
> > Importing:
> > - I have found only a couple of scripts[3,4] for this. They are both out
> >   of date, for old versions of both softwares. I have tried both to no
> >   avail. [4] is the most promising; It's not so old.
> >   I would really appreciate any help working on this.
> > 
> > I suppose this means that we will continue to use Mantis, and disable
> > issues in Gitlab for now. Any protests or ideas?
> > ----
> > 
> > Migrating from Gitolite:
> > 
> > For those whom are not aware, we currently use gitolite for all of the
> > lovely repos in our collection. We will need to copy all of the repos to
> > Gitlab, as well as duplicate permissions, and setup githooks.
> > 
> >  1. Create namespaces/groups on our Gitlab
> >  
> >  2. Clone repos. This can be done via the web interface "Import" option
> >  when creating a new repo, or the new remote can be added, and then
> >  pushed. The little script found here can help with getting all the
> >  repos from Gitolite[5]
> >  
> >  3. Setup redirects. eg.  https://gnunet.org/git ->
> >  https://gitlab.gnunet.org
> >  
> >  4. Manually replicate permissions. Will need a Gitolite admin's help
> >  on this.
> >  
> >  5. Setup githooks. We have quite a few githooks setup, so we will 
> >  need to recreate those.
> > 
> > After all of that is done, I think we should be ready to switch over
> > to Gitlab for at least the git management and CI/CD.
> > ----
> > 
> > That brings us to the final update: The CI System...
> > 
> > - We have a couple of small runners (thanks wldhx).
> > 
> > - We have some very basic '.gitlab-ci.yml'[6] files, defining jobs.
> >   - I will begin expanding these in the coming weeks.
> > 
> > **TODO**
> > 
> > - As we build out a matrix of pipelines, we will need more resources.
> > 'firefly.gnunet.org' is a logical option. In the past I've seen it
> > utilized heavily by experiments. As long as we are okay with dedicating
> > some CPU and RAM to runners, then I will begin setting them up.
> >  
> > - Setup Gitlab Container Registry [7] for storing our CI artifacts.
> > 
> > - Expand our '.gitlab-ci.yml' files to include e2e tests, builds for
> >   multiple architecures, and continuous delivery of packages for various
> >   package managers.
> > ----
> > 
> > Wow, so that's a lot of text. A lot of people have been asking me about
> > the status of Gitlab, and if and how they can help with CI. I hope this
> > gives people a thorough update, and answers. I really believe Gitlab can
> > be a useful software suite, despite its shortcomings. My hopes are that
> > it will help increase the feedback loop between development and testing,
> > as well as make it easier and more welcoming for new contributors. 
> > 
> > 
> > Be well, and Happy Hacking!
> > - Devan
> > 
> > 
> > [0] 
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnunet-developers/2019-01/msg00071.html
> > [1] 
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/gnunet-developers/2019-01/msg00082.html
> > [2] 
> > http://www.mantisbt.org/docs/master/en-US/Admin_Guide/html-desktop/#admin.config.display
> > [3] https://gitlab.kitware.com/utils/mantis-to-gitlab 
> > [4] https://github.com/timwiel/mantis2gitlab 
> > [5] 
> > https://tutorials.technology/tutorials/89-show-all-repositories-of-a-git-server.html
> > [6] https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/ci/quick_start/
> > [7] https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/user/project/container_registry.html
> 
> 
> 
> > _______________________________________________
> > GNUnet-developers mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
> 


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]