Re: [GNUnet-developers] Review of the new GNUnet website

[address@hidden]

sva transcribed 5.9K bytes:
> On 1 July 2019 1:54:03 AM GMT+02:00, "address@hidden" wrote:
> >Maybe bikeshed material, but should we mention 2001 - 2019 as our
> >copyright
> >year in the footer?
> 
> Ack.
> 
> >
> >Currently it refers to the inherited copyright of the taler website
> >codebase.
> >To take the start of the project as the copyright beginning (even
> >though then
> >GNUnet *eV* would be incorrect) would be another method (one which I
> >prefer).
> >
> >Thoughts?
> 
> Starting point with first whitepaper i find suitable.

I don't know when the first paper was published, but Christian told me
there might be old code inherited from back in the day, and the eV has
rights to it, so 2001 - 2019 is the correct date.
 
> Cheers,
> sva
> 
> 
> 
> --
> Sent from my phone with physical keyboard, in the rain.

pub   RSA 4096/1A37C219 2019-06-26 sva <address@hidden>
> sub   RSA 4096/699C2BFF 2019-06-26
>