[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Consider phasing out GNUNET_SERVICE_MAIN
From: |
Christian Grothoff |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Consider phasing out GNUNET_SERVICE_MAIN |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Sep 2019 06:04:54 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 |
On 9/7/19 4:20 PM, Alessio Vanni wrote:
> Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> but in this case there seems to be a better alternative: use
>> a C constructor to call GNUNET_OS_init():
>>
>> /**
>> * Initialize i18n
>> */
>> void __attribute__ ((constructor)) i18n_init () {
>> GNUNET_OS_init (...);
>> }
>>
>> Constructors run before main(), so that should fix your problem nicely.
>
> I wasn't aware of this feature. Would it be OK to add a constructor
> calling `GNUNET_OS_init' in the gnunet-ext service? It seems to be
> something that a reference implementation/template might want to show.
Sure, overall gnunet-ext could certainly be improved by illustrating
more things. Patches welcome ;-)
-Christian
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature