Re: Open questions regarding new messenger and secushare and organization Was: Make GNUnet Great Again

[t3sserakt]

Hey Bastian,

thank you very much for your support.

I like to explicitly invite you and everybody who likes to help some how
to our monthly GNUnet meeting. This meeting is not exclusively for main
developers or even developers at all. Do not expect us to find something
for you to do immediately, because that is also a matter of resource
allocation. There is enough to do, and we will find something. 

On 15.11.20 23:25, hyazinthe@emailn.de wrote:
> If I understand that right, we wouldn't had a problem here, at all, in the 
> first place, if 3 GNUnet key components on which secushare development highly 
> depends on, would be just fine: CADET, core and transport.
It is mainly transport. For CADET I am quite sure it is working.
> And as I got the impression, all these 3 components are in the process of 
> being revised to fit like that, but that process is a ton of work and 
> therefore lasts long.

We are only rewriting transport at the moment, which is indeed a lot of
work. Part of that is making NAT  traversal work much better, because
sometimes peers have problems getting into the network initially. When
we have something in place that is working (means unit test are not
failing), we might think of testing this NAT traversal in as many as
possible real world scenarios. 

Cheers

t3sserakt

OpenPGP_0x524982A0100F7490.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature