[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LSD0001 review
From: |
Maxime Devos |
Subject: |
Re: LSD0001 review |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Feb 2022 23:34:56 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.38.3-1 |
Schanzenbach, Martin schreef op do 10-02-2022 om 22:28 [+0000]:
> What I mean is that you would not look at a nick like that and think
> "I am going to add this to my zone".
> The use of a NICK is not defined in a normative way.
> There is no action associated with it that is qualified with a MUST or SHOULD.
> So users may consider the NICK record to when adding new PKEY delegations.
> They may choose not to. [...]
I thought that there was a special zone, the ‘pin zone’, that is
_automatically_ populated based on NICK records.
Anyway, I don't see problems here anymore.
Thanks for the explanation.
Greetings,
Maxime
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part